University in Geneva on undisclosed tobacco money
In a press release from The Geneva University on December 20th, Affaire
Rylander: l'Université de Genève tire ses conclusions, the
University distances itself from the attitude of Professor Ragnar Rylander
who concealed funding by Philip Morris from the ethical commission in
charge of reviewing research protocols, and from an editor in chief of a
scientific journal.
Earlier this year Karl-Erik Tallmo wrote a series of articles in Dagens
Forskning, a Swedish magazine on news in science, about Ragnar
Rylander [1-2]. In one of the articles Rylander stated that he has never
been a consultant for Philip Morris. As was known since the tobacco
archives went public, he then must have recieved 90.000 dollars yearly and
60.000 dollars yearly as unrestricted research grants, not to be a
consultant. Just shortly after this statement Rylander's contract with
Philip Morris from 1972 went public [3].
In Switzerland there has been an ongoing L'affair Rylander
with accusations of scientific misconduct. Rylander went to court charging
for calumniation. The first round was a success for Rylander on the case
of calumniation. But it was not all victory.
However, the University of Geneva was not happy, and have looked into the
files. Now they have come to a conclusion given in the press release. It
is stated that Rylander had research funding undisclosed to the ethical
commission in charge of reviewing research protocols, and to the editor in
chief of a scientific journal. The University of Geneva now publicly
distances itself from Prof. Rylander's attitude.
For more, and there is more, see comments and the press
release in English translation from Switzerland.
The University of Geneva has chosen to deal with the issue publicly.
Obviously they are concerned about scientific integrity, not only the
rhetorical appearance.